Wow! Extraordinary conversations! I learned sooooo much. I loved the explanations with passion & knowledge & experience. Rebecca presented this authentically on her show. Quality listening time. THANKYOU. 🙂
8 x 0 = 0: Archaeology that Adds up to Nothing By Steven & Evan William Strong "This article evolved out of a question which I first stumbled upon about six months ago that has no sensible answer. When discussing with my wife the intention to begin this comparison of opportunities denied with this mystery unanswered, she went to the machine I despise and asked the same question. The computer’s response only confirmed what I thought, no-one had a logical explanation, no substantial scientific research has been done and due consideration has never been given...........In my genetic case, and that of many Original people who have around one twentieth of their genetic code sourced from ancient Denisovan genes, to be called solely sapien falls short. Then in what adds to the discrepancy, throw into the Original mix a dash of Neanderthal and a liberal dose of an unknown mystery gene and what this adds up to it is not ‘pure-bred’ sapien, but something more like a genetic ‘dog’s breakfast.’..." Read More here: forgottenorigin.com/8-x-0-0-archaeology-that-adds-up-to-nothing... See MoreSee Less
More oxygen and food sources were more readily available on top of lesser competition for these resources, the animals lived like fat old kings. Now that our inland oceans and vegetation have disappeared it's become more a survival of the fittest, smaller means faster fitter and more elusive to avoid being prey! It's like reverse evolution unfortunately!
lesser gravity, may account for human giants too.
Spot on Cecelia Hall, our gravity I personally believe was a lot different, now we're all getting cancer because of this oxygen hating
fungus/bacteria that is thriving in our world, I'm thinking perhaps this was one of many missing links in why these human giants died, and no one to my knowledge has ever tested their cause of death that we are allowed to know about
In a nutshell concentrated oxygen
We can also see this by looking at our fossil record if we look in areas with large cliff walls , you can easily see the early eras with more oxygenated soils
In mythologies, the people lived for centuries. It's possible that the rotation of the Earth was faster, with faster days and years, maybe with less gravity because of it, from centrifugal force reduction, and slower rotation/more gravity being added over time to the present.
I love that this group has genuine members, egoes dont rule here, sharing does, together we can solve the mysteries. Love and Peace. 🙂
You will find that answer in the science of Mehran Keshe, the earths Magnetical and gravitational fields combined with those of the universe have a direct effect on the expression of living organisms. These conditions were very different back then.
Large insects and other air breathing arthropods in the Carboniferous were due to higher oxygen levels. Large size of dinosaurs compared to Cenozoic mammals I do not think everyone would agree upon. Myself I believe it is due to longer time spans of stable heavily vegetated areas and mammalian predation more often being able to catch up than dinosaur predation. That is, mammalian predators, I think, are more likely to be able to take down the largest herbivores at any given time. Large animals are more vulnerable to extinction than small ones. So this question relates to extinction. And the large dinosaurs went extinct a number of times, but it seems to me not as often as the largest Cenozoic mammals went extinct. In the seas we now have the almost extinct largest animals ever, the blue whales. Changes in tree types also is worth mentioning. Pines for example are not likely to support large grazing animals, and are more abundant now than in the Mesozoic. IN the tropics now, the niche for large animals grazing the tree tops is largely unfilled unlike during the Jurassic and Cretaceous.
Much higher Oxygen levels
Ohhh thats easy! ... lol...i gotta get my boy up for school but ill be back with my far out explanation that will make allll the sense in the world 😁😄 . If your mind is open 😉😜😜😎😎
The need to hide and eat less with amongst the changing environment
Environment, Diet and competition.... evolution favoured a smaller creature..in the future as the environment changes so will the life that lives in it.
Something else to consider associated with the question......From Isaac Asimov Phd. The sun must have been shining on the Roman Empire much as it does today. Also it must have been shining in the age of the dinosaurs much as it does today. 'Then from another essay:- The sun is losing mass at the rate of half a million tons per second. E=Mc². Back in the 1980's on my Commodore 64 (the best computer of the day) I devised a programme that calculated the mass for millions of years and drew circles of the appropriate size. A million years ago the sun was twice the size. After that it grew every million years by a factor of 1/8. 65 million years ago the sun had swallowed Mercury. 200 million years ago it had swallowed Venus and the dinosaurs in all probability were running around in the corona. Something is definitely wrong and I suggest it's a flaw in E=Mc² and the sun is not losing mass
Actually here's an out-of-left-field answer for you.
There are ways to know oxygen levels in the past. For example the number of stomatopores in gingkos. They had less in the Carboniferous than any other time.It changes over time, but does not explain why some land vertebrates were bigger in the Mesozoic than any in the Cenozoic.
The Earth was actually in a closer orbit to the Sun. Which made the Earth's effective gravity much less due to the greater pull of the Sun's gravitational field. Have a look at the 'Expanding Earth' video on you-tube. Basically the Earth was whacked out of it's inner orbit and broke apart, it's 'expansion' is the result of attaining a new equilibrium in it's new orbital position. Note that age tests on all core samples of the ocean floors show that no ocean is older than 65 million years, roughly the extinction point of the dinosaurs. I'm pretty sure that it was one of Professor Brian Cox's series where he made the comment that nothing over a relatively small weight survived the dinosaur extinction event. The original Earth sphere was about the size of Mars. This also rather suggests that the Earth is hollow to some extent and does not have a molten core. It also has 'zero' gravity at the centre. Think of a force vector diagram regarding gravity at the Earth's centre.
It is thought no or few animals over 25 kilos survived the K / T on land or sea. Plants (trees) are just as large now as in the Mesozoic.
Thanks Alan, you wouldn't happen to know the source for that information?
Oxygen levels were thicker.
Solar storms and climate change could have played a big part, Andrew?
Land arthropods pump air into their bodies by a bellow like system. It is not very efficient to get oxygen to deeper tissues. So they can get bigger if the air has more oxygen.
Imagine.... a planet covered in clear pure water..... the land masses that do exist are lush with MASSIVE vegetation ...treessss pushing through the sky hundreds of kms.... the atmosphere 'bubble ' of this planet is wiiiide ...huuge. therefore allowing anything that grows to become colossal! ..... Trees had a different chemical make up...' silica based 😉. .the creatures also grew hiuuuuge . Suddenly the planet is discovered by a scientific race of beings...known for splicing and dicing and creating new slave races for their own greed . They begin their experiments using the existing creatures of the planet.... they needed new slaves to mine this resourse rich place ! ...... so they created them... but thats another story...lol... soooo they mined and cut everything down with massive alien machinery. . They felled the giant trees and took them away along with half the water..... the planet wobbled on its axis.... stuff happened..... thennn the planet tilted...stopped...and began rotating in the other direction . The removal of the massive trees and water had altered the atmosphere...shrunk it in and levelled it out ! ... Then the planet was renamed Earth...and put in cosmic chains ! .... 😉 ... imagine ~ ~ ~
I don't normaly post anything here, but I realy wanted to share this with you all XOX 💕💜💕 Together, Uluru and Kata Tjuta form the world Solar Plexus Chakra. The geometric centre is equidistant between Uluru and Kata Tjuta.
This is the primary chakra for the maintenance of global health and vitality. If things are not right Down Under then the whole system suffers. ... See MoreSee Less
Here is a map of Denisovan genes. Keep in mind this likely includes the unknown third lineage of pre modern humans from North of Australia. Denisovans appear to be a Cold adapted sister group to Neandertal. So these high concentrations of Denisovan genes near Australia do not make much sense even without the report indicating a yet unknown third group being confused with Denisovans. The migration from Australia to South America was made by seafaring people. This easily could have started a bit to the North, sweeping along with it genes of the unknown people. And / or Denisovan genes could have come down into South America by early migrations from Asia through North America. The map shows the Denisovan and third group genes are not much present down into Australia. So back to the same point. Why would an out of Africa event not sweep these genes down into Australia very well, if passing through the areas of strong horizontal gene flow as shown on the map? Or why is an out of Australia event not sweeping them into Africa? It seems obvious the original event did not include this mixing, either way it went, if we do not assume a sea voyage from Africa jumping over the areas of genetic mixing. For me this last explanation is impossible, the Australian genome would see bottle necking from that which is NOT the case. The same is true for a sea voyage in reverse. So I conclude the original modern human populations predate both the Denisovan and the unknown third group mixing with modern humans in Asia. And predate the migration into South America of around 28,000 years ago. If the movement of the earliest modern humans was from Australia, then it can be MUCH older than the genetic models and out of Africa hypothesis suggest. Easily as much as 250,000 years ago I would estimate. I would guess 110,000 to 140,000 years ago (if it was an out of Australia event, out of Africa about as they time it in the hypothesis). The assumption that modern humans are only known from Africa and their recent migrations elsewhere remains a hypothesis. Because genetic studies do not indicate the actual location of divergences, and there is a basal population still of this event in Australia, which is not easily explained by the hypothesis given the genetic and fossil evidence. Nor can I easily explain at this time an out of Australia or out of Asia event. Or even a multiregional hypothesis extention to the earliest modern humans spread out from Africa to Australia. The studies almost all have preconceived notions, along with the relative lack of unbiased studies and studies looking for evidence of every likely possibility, it remains a cloud to me. I do see a general trend for the entire Southern Hemisphere. More conservative modern humans to the South and more modern / derived ones to the North. This best fits a model in which the first modern humans were wide spread along the South of the World originally, and incursions of other types of humans pushed them in their more pure forms South. They then broke out again going back over ground they were on before and swamping every other type of human genetically. I assume this second event would be from Africa and / or Australia, based upon genetic evidence. That is to me the evidence points towards a linked early population for modern humans, between Africa and Australia, a break in that link, and then linking up again more recently at some point in between. ... See MoreSee Less
Revisiting this report below. Out of Africa 50-78 thousand years ago. And this leaves Denisovans much more isolated from the modern human gene pool than thought. Denisovan genes being so low if we accept this in modern humans, the percentages seen any place could be explained easily by relatively modern migrations of people who are already mixed. So what this report indicates, is that there is an entire unknown human lineage existing around Australia BEFORE modern humans, OR Australians migrated in from some place else carrying this lineage and went entirely extinct that some place else and along the way hiding this fact. They need to look for this unknown lineage in South American Native Americans also, as they come mostly from Australia as we now know, around 28,000 years ago. I think there is a much simpler explanation for this, something like has been suggested before by myself and others on face book independently of me. Horizontal gene flow between Australian Native peoples and an early human branch related to Homo floresiensis. If so, as Homo floresiensis is the most conservative of all known humans, this would imply the human chromosome count goes back very far, OR the major gene flow managed to jump that barrier (which is possible as seen in wild horses etc.). So does that mean an African migration meeting these older human genes and mixing with them? Perhaps. OR it can mean the horizontal gene flow took place as modern humans or their close stem group came out of Australia, and AFTER the gradual migration all the way to Africa. This for example could occur if the migrating modern humans passed all the way to Africa fairly quickly, as in a few thousand years, and only over more time and / or distance had horizontal gene flow with this early human family branch. Such as Island hopping and then to the mainland initially by a path not bringing them into contact with the ancient lineage. Or encountering the ancient lineage on the mainland some place not in the original path to Africa. The apparent low influx of Denisovan genes, and their limited known geographic range in the areas of interest to this movement, implies there was another pre modern Homo people along the Coast of Southern Asia. The geographic origin of these people, even their species or affinities to Homo floresiensis, is unknown. As these genes are not in Africa, it is difficult to explain them as an out of Africa event. Or even an out of Asia event, as that makes it hard to explain how they were able to mix with Australian populations so much and not others (to as much degree) in Asia. Where an out of Africa event to Australia, should have encoutnered such people along the way to carry their genes to Australia, and back washed the genes to Africa and better into Asia (but this still could be how it happened). So some unknown people X some place in or to the North of Australia, whose genes got MOST into the area of Australia. This indicates there was movement, but not the direction of that movement, as we know that Australian genetics represent movements both to the North / East / West and South since this mixing would have occurred. It does indicate that if modern humans emerged from Australia, they emerged BEFORE this mixing event, so the migration would have been pretty old say more than 50,000 years ago. So two remnant populations of original modern humans (or their only surviving close relatives), one in Australia, the other in Southern Africa. The very high genetic diversity of both groups, in my opinion at least, excludes the possibility of migrations, other than mass migrations by land (that is slowly and over time). So I am still left at the same point, a single originally connected population which drifted from some point, some place from Southern Africa to Australia, to fill in all the gaps. NOT some massive boat migration from Southern Africa to Australia later obscured by genetic drift and local adaptation. If the migration was from Australia, it is a reasonable model that relatively pure lines managed to get into Africa before mixing with Denisovans Neandertals and unknown people X, which mixing then back washed into Australia at an early date. I will study South American Native genetic reports to try and see if that back washing was all or in part more than around 28,000 years ago. Seems to me it at least in part was based upon morphological similarities to these potentially external to Australia genes, but not easy to find something from genetic reports that the geneticists were not looking for. ... See MoreSee Less
If turn you around it look like a dhinawan but if you turn again it look like a bay a river a leg a shooting star
Message stone I'm thinking, depicting there are kangaroos in that area, and the area to hunt, and the stone is generally left for the next mob that comes through to find it and so on. An amazing from of communication to avoid wasted energies looking for food and water for example. Especially in harsh desert climates where resources are key to survival, aboriginal people certainly looked after each other.
You are sharp eyed, keep finding more of these stones!
Traditional headdress worn by three men from Darnley Island (Erub), Torres Straits Islands, 1921.
Interestingly, TI culture and people are more similar to that on Papua New Guinea than to mainland Australia.
Photo credit: Frank Hurley
"Also to add to the content for the post....our TSI dreaming stories, pre colonisation kinship relations & trading encompasses and is connected between islands & further to both PNG & mainland Australia Cape York. Which might not be known by many too who read this post still evident & maintained today" - see comment below by Suane. ... See MoreSee Less
Copeland NSW scene of a great gold rush in the 1800's. What isn't let known was that it was an Aboriginal Youth who discovered the gold. He was in a team of Cedar Cutters in the area when he was sent to wash the dinner bowls at the river, when he returned they noticed there was alluvial gold in the bottom of the bowl. Nothing was said after this for fear of reprisal with the law, until a few years later when The Government issued a reward for the discovery of gold. Then the two Cedar Cutters came forward and claimed the reward. Nothing is mentioned of the Aboriginal youth who had discovered it. If anyone is interested in doing a story on this and the Copeland Aboriginal History let me know as I have acccess to information and a gold mine. Aboriginal People have always been left out of discoveries in White man's version of History it's time that people learnt how much of our History is because of them. ... See MoreSee Less
Sad story , be nice to have the actual history told .
I will private message you Ros happy to write this and donate proceeds to what ever aboriginal association you choose ...be my pleasure xx
I'm a good writer and also good amateur photographer will make sure I put my heart into it xxx
Gunwinggu region, men with such markings could swim through crocodile waters unharmed. The ripples (markings) put a song into the water as you move through it (swim) and the crocodile would be 'wary' or 'respectful' of the vibration. That's the succinct Lore story, though the actual dynamics of relationship within that story is going to be a lot longer to cover.
The one on the left appears to have a nose more like Africans or European
Random question, but were women scarred too? For initiation and such?
I have an uncle friend from lochardt river mob(far N.E Qld), who has chest scars..
Some US plains tribes and others still practice chest scarring. For example dragging and then tearing out buffalo skulls worn during a vision quest and attached through the flesh in the back by cords.
I also have Paradolia. I wonder if it is a blessing, OR not? This photo is off a book cover. It's easy to see an elder looking down.
Once upon a time I was at a friends placed near boonah in S.E. Qld. When I left to go home(little mt edward on lake moogerah), about a 2 hr walk away, a storm developed(moogerah means place where storms begin), I felt a need to beat the storm home, so I jogged home, when I reached the ridge of th mountain I lived on just above it was clearly an ancient original elders face in that storm, on the war path was my feeling at that time, so I ran the rest of the way, just got to my front door and then the rain thundered down in a torrent. This was one of my experiences where I felt part of the living dreamtime. Im a believer. 🙂
Recently, my friend (who lives right across the road from Hanging Rock) asked me to come to her place for the weekend, as Bruce Springsteen was playing there. We were sitting in her paddock, listening to the music, and I was looking at the rock, as it had been illuminated and was looking sensational. I was telling her that I see faces of people everywhere in nature, which she replied "what a lot of b..s", being the sceptic that she is! Anyway, on the rock I could see an elder, complete with ochre face and body painting. When I pointed it out to her, she was astounded, as she could see him too. I googled Hanging Rock, and discovered it was a ceremonial meeting place for the Kulin Nation, and I even found a photo of a Wurundjeri man with the same ochre painting. I think it is a blessing 🙂
Took this few days after Christmas.. the guitar gods want to play with me .. I hope ..
I think that Homo has probably been fully bipedal since the divergence with gibbons (in Asia). And that all apes after the divergence which are quadrupedal / knuckle walkers / fist walkers are derived in this respect relative to the common ancestor. There has been no comparative studies that I am aware of, between bipedalism in Homo floresiensis and gibbons. I think they show relationship to the point of both being derived from a bipedalism they share in common ancestrally. Here is a good article on gibbon bipedalism. . ... See MoreSee Less
When gibbons travel through the forest canopy, brachiation is alternated with short bipedal bouts over horizontal boughs. We know, from previous research, that brachiation is a very efficient locomoto...
The authors have two proposals to explain their Y chromosome discovery in Africa. The first, interbreeding with Neandertals or Denisovans (or presumably some other lineagse in Africa not mentioned). The other that modern humans are much older than the fossil record indicates. In modern genetics it is not thought there is much if any Denisovan or Neandertal genes in Africa (I am sure there is, just less than other places). What to me this points to is just what I have already suggested. That modern human lineages are much older than the African fossil record, because the older ones are in Asia. They could also be in Africa or in Australia, in any of the three cases, they are not recognized in the fossil record at this time. ... See MoreSee Less
Biripi warrior and hunter in ceremonial body paint with shield, boomerangs, spear thrower and spear from around Port Macquarie, NSW, circa. 1905.
We have been getting requests for help to track down certain photos from certain areas, tribes and clans and we're always happy to see what we can come up with if you give us enough information to go by.
Our ancestors whether they were Biripi, Tiwi, Yolngu, Yorta Yorta, Italian, Scottish, Irish, Chinese, Greek, Egyptian or any combination of these and others make us who we are so here's to our forebears, we would not be here without them!
A human lice divegence at 1.18 million years by a genetic clock model. The older form seen only in the New World. The authors propose an explanation. I see another possibility. When the Americas were first settled, South America from Australia (which is well established it is thought at about 28,000 years ago, genetic and fossil human evidence in South America for this), the lice came from Australia. And remained the dominant louse in the Americas. In Australia the newer form for the rest of the World migrated in after the migration to South America, replacing the older form of louse in Australia. Again, the biological clock only gives an idea (usually), of the timing of the divergence. Does not tell where it happened. All we really know from this is some how, the Americas have a MUCH older form of lice than the rest of the World. It is also possible lie did not get established in the New World, and these are from Asiatic apes or humans other than modern Homo, in the Americas close enough to humans to transfer lice to them. Lice do jump host types, but they tend to stay with their hosts over time once established in that host without letting other forms come on unless the niche becomes vacant. ... See MoreSee Less
Points Not Considered:- Every Out of Africa Theory has a few Africans stranded in Australia unable to return. Over the Next 5,000 years along the Northern Top End, then over the next 10,000 years spread further down both coastlines, past that point they gradually inch up the river system and finally into the interior, at least 20,000 years after entry. Now we have cruise ship full to the brim with enough Africans to populate the whole of Australia a few thousand years after entry. That doesn't make sense. what also doesn't make sense is Jim Bowler's date of 80-90,000 years at Point Richie, the engraved saltwater crocodile at Panaramitee, (that Josephine Flood insists ia at least 75,000 years old). At Lake George the evidence of human occupation varies between 60-120,000 years. All this Study does is confirm a date when Original people were in this country, everywhere, fully established, it does not tell us when it began but only confirms of a date well after when the whole nation was fully settled. Unless of course the experts are wrong and it was a flotilla of African boats that sailed here, either way the science in this country is all over the place. What would be interesting is finding a date for the new strand of DNA found only in Original people which is not found in any other racial group. Since it is assumed that once the Original people got here they never left, does that mean this mysterious hominid group also sailed to Australia. I noticed this study didn't factor that into their deliberations nor did they include some of the sites we have mentioned. In response to:- ... See MoreSee Less
Aboriginal Australians represent one of the longest continuous cultural complexes known. Archaeological evidence indicates that Australia and New Guinea were initially settled approximately 50 thousan...
They have actually reduced the previous (already drastically reduced) timescale to colonise both coastlines from 5 - 10 thousand years down to 1500 to 2000 years. Words that come to mind; 'farse', 'ludicrous' 'incredulous', 'desperation'.
I do not understand why you think the scientists or experts are wrong?? Where is your scientific evidences to prove they are wrong?? Please I like read your results... I think is not rights to say "wrong" because I think the evidences is accurate.
What most people do not understands that Original People of Australia have four different Ancestries which they are:
1: Native Oceanians
- Native Australian
- Native Melanesian
3. East Asia
4. Sub-Saharan Africa
It all in the DNA evidences.
Also the Haplogroup L3 mtDNA is still uncertain and still debating by experts or scientists.
So we have conservative scientists claiming a certain time frame but evidence that proves them wrong Graham Mumbulla-Avery .
From what I read, he said: "Unless of course the experts are wrong and it was a flotilla of African boats that sailed here..."
This is countering previous suggestion by academics in which it was suggested maybe one boat of African immigrants populated Australia. Now, with the latest claims of rapid colonisation of all 25,700 miles of Australia's coastline (actually Sahul had a much more extended coastline) we see this single boat theory for what it really is, a joke.
For a dozen hunter-gatherers to become a society large enough to have spread along this immense distance in just 2000 years is just not believable, is it?
Why are they wrong? Yes I have seen Jim Bowler.
I think scientists suggested they found the evidences to prove their theories.
I don't know much about boats because there hardly evidences of boats existed. Remember the Ancestors of Original Australians and Melanesian were living in East Asia or South Asia for 10,000 years before their later generation after interbred with Denisovan People they migrated to Sahul.
Simply because there are archaeological evidences of sites and artifacts that are older than their suggested time frame.
However I do believes they made a form of rafts to travel to Sahul coastline that nearer to Sunda coastline than 18,000 years ago or today 2017.
2000 years is longer than 60 years of one human live span. if I am adapted to a particular environment and learnt how to hunt animals and live with family all my life, why would I wanted to move?? Maybe I moved because I have ceremonies to attend or see my old friends from mile away that I used to dance with them in ceremonies. Or I seeing my wife's family far away from my parents' Countries. All of those may have happens to the Ancestors of Original Australians.
We can't be asked to remember things that are not supported by evidence, please substantiate your claim that:
"Ancestors of Original Australians and Melanesian were living in East Asia or South Asia for 10,000 years before their later generation after interbred with Denisovan People they migrated to Sahul."
I don't see convincing evidence for those suggestions.
We have to explain two things, how a supposedly tiny population grew so large in just 100 generations that it was now inhabiting the entire enormous coastline (and much of the interior), and secondly what pressure would provoke the need to spread themselves out in this manner. So far no convincing theory has been offered. Nowhere else on Earth do we see this happening in the ancient stoneage world.
Why do Original Australians have East Asian ancestry??
They don't, East Asians have Australasian ancestry, that is very clear in the genetics.
If East Asians are 40,000 years old, and Australasians are at least 50-70,000 years old, by what mechanism do you propose that the younger population can be ancestral to the older population?
Seem like the scientific evidences suggested that Native People of South East Asia are related to PNG and Australia.
Of course they are related, the issue is who came first.
The academics tell us the answer, mainland Asia was colonised 40,000 years ago.
The earliest start of that colonisation being a little before 50,000 years ago, but only down in South East Asia, not East Asia or anywhere else.
I think there a big gaps between genetic from Europe, Asia and Australia because what I saw that Oceanian Ancestors were the first Homo sapien sapiens to leave Africa.
And there is the problem we have discussed previously. We have the oldest people down in Australasia not in Asia, yet all the genomic studies from 2016 and 2017 have concluded a single wave of founder population. This is terminal for the current OoAT model.
I will say it clearly for everybody, your ancestors can't be younger than you.
South East Asia have native people like Ageta People are closely related to Original Australians.
Join us in the morning of April 18th as we have a doubleheader for you! At 7pm pst we go to Australia to talk to About his UFO2GO Paranormal Investigation!
At 2pm pst we talk to Jeff Irving producer ...
UNPLUGGED with DEE and ANNIE - THE PHENOMENA OF GIANTS with Cecelia Hall 4-18-2017 Direct link to show: www.spreaker.com/…/unplugged-w-dee-annie-1-cecelia-h… This is an excellent launch of Unplugged, because the energy is there between everyone in the studio. Three continents and a very small Island next to a Very Big island they call Scotland. Modern Tech is a marvel. We hope you enjoy the insights that are shared by the Queen Snakes of the USOKS Den. Cecelia's Links: ceesblog.wordpress.com/…/23/reports-of-giant-burialsUNPLUGGED with DEE and ANNIE - THE PHENOMENA OF GIANTS with Cecelia Hall 4-18-2017 Direct link to show: www.spreaker.com/user/8856752/unplugged-w-dee-annie-1-cecelia-hall-and This is an excellent launch of Unplugged, because the energy is there between everyone in the studio. Three continents and a very small Island next to a Very Big island they call Scotland. Modern Tech is a marvel. We hope you enjoy the insights that are shared by the Queen Snakes of the USOKS Den. Cecelia's Links: ceesblog.wordpress.com/2014/06/23/reports-of-giant-burials... See MoreSee Less
That was interesting. I think that a relook should happen. But it takes years to overturn accepted theory from established lot.
UnTold ReVelaTions Need To Be Told ThaT Will ToTallY ReWriTe HiSTory........
Goes BeYond That Gene
The Human Race Was Around The Time Of The Dinosaurs...
Australian Aboriginals have the same Mtcdna as Indians and a few other tribes across the Australasia's have the same...Guess what there is 1 Tribe in Africa that has that same Mtcdna...#just saying, whatever you make of that is up to you mate
I think the history of human race is still out there to be solved. It is however far more complicated than the established view.
Great article. Most unscientific to waste time, evidence and reources defending any ego viewpoint on incomplete information, instead we can be investigating facts. Truth will out. Loved the article. Our human heritage is so much more interesting than some imagine.
It may have sailed across the Sahara, and kept as a souvenir to remember their ancestors
Block me, LMAO
Kathleen Koblensky ir sailed a see of light they knew light waves
Like · Reply · April 14 at 4:14am
Bob Newton And you received your degree in Miracleology from where?
Like · Reply · 5 mins
Kathleen Koblensky is there something wrong in what i said except i spelled --it wrong---?
Like · Reply · 3 mins
Bob Newton Oh nothing,,, nothing at all.... Walks away shaking head, LMFAO.... They sailed a sea of light, they knew the light waves.... Nope, nothing at all.....
Like · Reply · 1 min
Kathleen Koblensky what the frig.....you are a slime good bye bob
Like · Reply · Just now
Bob Newton I believe in Reality, not Miracleology....
Dear Ministers - Aboriginal women's business still matters in 2017. The Awabakal women's Butterfly Cave is a sacred site at risk from a Roche Group housing development. Our initial petition to Roche ...
Did the ancient Egyptians know that Oak Island was very close to being halfway between the Equator and the North Pole? Was the azimuth line that starts at the Great Pyramid, going across Oak Island and connecting to teh Washington Temaple, the Egyptian concept of deviding the earth into two-halfs? This azimuth line when extented from Oak Island, going across Oak Island eventually appears to connect to New Zealand and the Great Pyramid. The meaning the azimuth line from the Great Pyramid to teh Great Pyramid via Oak Island has made a complete circle of the earth. Did the ancinet Eygptian have this kind of knowledge. I believe so. At this point in time this should be only view as an investigation on my part. ... See MoreSee Less
Here is a short clip from the YouTube video Chariods of the Gods
van daneiken started my journey back in th day, I was ostricized for sharin that knowledge back then, FB has many negatives, but is a powerful eye openner and sharing fascilitator, these days I dont feel like a freak anymore for alternate views. 🙂
From Giza to Giza! For those of you live in Austrailia and New Zealand, you might find this short Google Earth video interesting.
Here is the Great Pyramid and the Washington Temple connection.
It looked like a face to me. Maybe on a different angle it would more so.
Maybe I just see faces in everything...
The stone wall it was leaning against, looked interesting as well. 😊
Different levels Melody. The rock was carved with figuring on a gross level. Then illustrations and faint etchings were used to create cameo scenes within the spaces. Finally micro images were used to fill every blank space remaining. At each level the sub-images were carefully woven to accommodate the next level of images. As indicated in the blog feature - it is only possible to study the micro cameos and imagery if each picture is saved/as to your own full computer screen to be examined at even greater magnification. Each level is a world of its own, but compliments the theme of the grosser images they are a part of... The delineation is also done at micro level, with the drawing lines at one or two pixel width ...and the shading is simply for greater emphasis of the focal depth of the images.:::::: Take another look at the adjusted version of picture you featured above. It took every ounce of willpower to resist drilling right down into the micro/fractal images. I had tried to concentrate on the larger carved forms on the surface... Look as deep (enlarged) as you can to get to the detail that is there :::::: (With thanks for the feedback.. I have tagged this to the blog)
Thank-you. I can see a lot more of it in that, compared to the already zoomed in versions that i viewed in the post. I couldn't tell what I was looking at for some reason.
There really is a lot of dimensions to it. Interesting. 😊
We try to uncover hidden aspects of Australian history and to bring to light imagery from the past that would otherwise remain unseen in archives, private collections, libraries and universities...
Here is an interesting photo of Aboriginal men in 1888 from the Lake Killalpaninna region, South Australia, and a story about whose law applies in this land.
Notes relating to the photo:
"The natives in the accompanying photograph were members of five different tribes living near Lake Killalpaninna, west of Koppera-manna Mission Station in 1888.
The eleven who are standing, and the one seated at each end, with another named Woolpappina, (14 in all) were charged at the Port Augusta Criminal Court on 22nd November 1888 with having murdered a native named Nadlajeppera.
The 'murder' was really an act of tribal justice executed upon Nadlajeppera because he was believed to have caused the death of Woolpappina's son by pointing a bone at him.
The prisoners were all aquitted with the exception of Woolpappina, who not only admitted that he had speared the deceased, but claimed the honour of having been the first to spear him.
Though sentence of death had to be pronounced on Woolpappina the punishent was afterwards commuted to a short term of imprisonment by the Governor in Council.
The names of the prisoners were: Woolpappina (not in the photograph), Wallaby, Stjena, Nollapannina, Terrilena, Zourakachinna, Pillipunkana, Kunyanarrina, Warkoo-war-Koona, Willa-willana, Jerke-lina, Kantonunga, Poode-wampana and Nappawirrana. The four seated figures in the centre of the picture were witnesses in the case. Only three of them were called. The names of these were August Mowellena, Emanuel Patramorana and Joshua Packatana...".
The truth finally comes out... We have been saying for weeks that these changes to Native Title were for big mining and Adani!
Gautam Adani asked Malcolm Turnbull during their meeting today in India ...
The amount of clothing worn varied throughout Australia depending on climate. In cooler regions, coverings made from possum and other marsupial species were used whereas the tropical north required only minimal if any clothing.
Here, a South Australia man is seen wearing a kangaroo fur cloak, circa. 1876.
He carries a finely made woven bag and is equipped with a shield, club and boomerang, all superbly crafted. These are essential items for a hunter/warrior.
We are gravely concerned about the push by Adani and the Queensland Government to open up the Carmichael Mine on our traditional lands. Our traditional lands are an interconnected and living whole; a ...
Join us on Earth Day for the exclusive premiere screening of "Operation Jeedara" documenting our fight to keep oil giants out of the Great Australian Bight. Proudly presented by Sea Shepherd Australia...